Instructors must realize that setting up an online course is not the same as setting up a seated course. Different assessments and pedagogies must be used in online education. Group participation must be assessed and the use of traditional testing (multiple-choice or true false) is not an accurate way to assess what students have learned in the online environment (Siemens, 2008), (Palloff and Pratt, 2007, p. 41).
Other questions and concerns of online collaboration in education are: If a student does not want to network or collaborate in a learning community for an online course, what should the other members of the learning community do? What role should the instructor play? What impact would this have on his or her assessment plan?
If a student does not want to collaborate an instructor can work with the student as much as possible, but should clarify that collaboration with others is a component of the course. While the student could complete the course without collaborating with others, an instructor should encourage this medium, explain its benefits to the student, and explain that the collaboration component is only one aspect of the course. Siemens (2008) suggests that instructors be flexible in their assessment of online groups and that “Learners can feel more comfortable when they understand the learning communities aren’t 100 percent of the grade”.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Siemens, G. (Presenter). (2008). Assessment of Collaborative Learning. (Vodcast). Laureate Education, Inc. Principles of Distance Education. Baltimore: Author.
Siemens, G. (Presenter). (2008). Learning Communities. (Vodcast). Laureate Education, Inc. Principles of Distance Education. Baltimore: Author
No comments:
Post a Comment